The website has whole page top top this issue. Here"s a short snippet.
You are watching: Pair of pants singular or plural
Before the work of contemporary tailoring, such garments, whether underwear or outerwear, were without doubt made in 2 parts, one because that each leg. The piece were placed on each leg separately and then wrapped and tied or belted in ~ the belt (just favor cowboys’ chaps). The plural consumption persisted the end of habit also after the apparel had end up being physically one piece. However, a shirt was a single piece the cloth, so that was constantly singular.
enhance this answer
answered Dec 21 "10 in ~ 11:34
john SattaJohn Satta
4,97411 yellow badge2525 silver badges3030 bronze badges
add a comment |
Apparently in the past they were 2 tube weakly linked, think to existing tights. Hence the many form.
enhance this price
answered Dec 21 "10 in ~ 9:55
1,24633 gold badges1111 silver- badges1616 bronze title
| display 1 more comment
It actually makes perfect sense. Think of this examples. "The clown wore a pair that pants whereby one pant to be red and the other pant green". Also, "The amputee wore his pants through one pant tied up and also the various other pant covering his an excellent leg". The ideal use the the singular and plural is supplied to make the meaning clear. Or if friend look at panties together a whole with 2 openings or two short upper foot coverings we use the plural, however, if we just refer to the solitary toursal opened we to speak "panty waist", particularly when referring to a male who is much less masculine or that acts cowardly. And also by the method "sleeves" is upper body tantamount of pants. "The shirts has quick sleeves". "He wore quick sleeves". In both these examples we offered sleeves together a noun. Once we usage it together an adjective of a singular noun, we use the singular, ". . . Short-sleeve shirt".
boost this prize
answer Oct 1 "13 in ~ 21:12
Bob BensonBob Benson
2911 bronze badge
include a comment |
It"s referring to the components that comprise the whole. A pair that pants consists of 2 pants. Lot like a pair of glasses (usually) has actually two pieces of glass.
improve this price
answered Dec 21 "10 in ~ 11:19
1,9141111 silver badges1111 bronze badges
add a comment |
The "proper" phrasing, is more lax 보다 most. Simply as girlfriend don"t have to say "I" in ~ the beginning of sentences that indicate the word.
The many "pants" is already the many of pant.Pairs is the word which i do not care plural when referring come multiple pairs of pants.
Merely we lazy so grammar has to make an exemption for rememberingsomer.com gift a life language and also people speaking together they wish. The "pairs of" came to be implicit in-context.
Pants are accurately representing the plural of trousers at all times with a typical "s". A apparel factory may have 999 pants, though we will certainly usually speak to these "pant legs" because of ambiguous usage.
"Pair that pants" is adjusted to "pairs the pants" but we do not constantly say "pair of" or "pairs of"; creating the confusion.
This uses equally to binoculars, socks, glasses and any thing which deserve to be correctly explained as "pairs that X" yet often wake up abridged.
See more: Guide Me To The Right Person Or Direct Me To The Right Person ?
boost this answer
answer Oct 18 in ~ 0:11
Garet ClabornGaret Claborn
1,82211 yellow badge1212 silver- badges2020 bronze badges
add a comment |
I think it just like the "shoes". Girlfriend cannot have one "shoe" and one "part" of the pants.
boost this prize
reply Dec 21 "10 at 10:47
Ngoc PhamNgoc Pham
| present 1 much more comment
Highly energetic question. Knife 10 reputation (not counting the association bonus) in order come answer this question. The reputation requirement helps safeguard this concern from spam and also non-answer activity.
Not the answer you're spring for? Browse other questions tagged nouns grammatical-number or ask your own question.
Featured on Meta
Is "pair the scissors" much more correct 보다 "scissors"?
"The back of his pants is/are..."
Does (or did) "a trouser" or "a scissor" have a meaning?
What is the etymology that a pair of trousers
Pants — "is it" or "are they"?
His national politics is not good/ His national politics are no good
pants — "is it" or "are they"?
plural of "fleece" when referring to fleece coat
space words favor "scissors" plural?
walk "including" adjust the plural?
Why is "thong" singular?
"The earlier of his trousers is/are..."
"Pants-changing" versus "diaper(s)-changing"
hot Network questions much more hot concerns
i ordered it to RSS
concern feed To i ordered it to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader.
rememberingsomer.com Language & consumption
ridge Exchange Network
site design / logo © 2021 ridge Exchange Inc; user contributions license is granted under cc by-sa. Rev2021.11.4.40650