I"ve always been taught to placed myself last when referring come myself in the same sentence as others however the usage of "me and..." appears to be everywhere these days. The misuse of the word "me" rather of "I" aside, is there some brand-new rule ns haven"t heard of? Shouldn"t we put ourselves critical regardless of the "me"/"I" usage?

Examples of "correct" usage:

My friends and I go for some ice cream. Walk you watch my friends and me at the ice cream stand?

Examples the "incorrect" usage:

Me and also my friends went for some ice cream. Walk you see me and my friends at the ice cream cream stand?

Note: i was likewise taught that the only human who could put themselves first was the queen.

You are watching: Myself and my team or my team and i

grammaticality pronoun word-order politeness
boost this inquiry
edited Dec 10 "16 in ~ 1:17

69.6k99 yellow badges170170 silver- badges309309 bronze title
asked Aug 17 "10 in ~ 7:55

1,42344 gold badges1414 silver badges1717 bronze badges
include a comment |

5 answers 5

active earliest Votes
The difference between "I and my friends" and "my friends and I" is purely a matter of courtesy - they room both grammatically correct. I would tend to stick come the last though, as it a) is much more commonplace, b) is considered more polite, c) seems to flow better.

Indeed, your instance of "incorrect" intake is incorrect solely in the the an initial sentence offers the accusative (objective) pronoun me, when you actually require the please select candidate (subjective) pronoun "I". The 2nd sentence of that instance is correct, since the pronoun demands to it is in in the accusative, together the object. You seem to understand this though; this is simply to clarify.

enhance this answer
edited Oct 23 "17 in ~ 16:47

reply Aug 17 "10 at 8:02

12.7k33 yellow badges5656 silver badges6363 bronze title
add a comment |
There is a propensity in informal speech and also writing to usage object pronouns as soon as conjoined with other nouns or pronouns, even if serving together the topic of a verb. You never ever hear this intake if the topic is no conjoined; the is, no native speaker would say “me go for part ice cream” yet “me and my friends walk for part ice cream” is actually fairly a typical usage produced by aboriginal speakers of every kinds.

This happens due to the fact that what linguists would call the “unmarked” or standard, basic kind for pronouns transforms out to it is in the target form—me, him, her, them, and also the like. This is the form of the pronoun offered when over there is no verb:

Who wants a cookie?Me.

See more: How Much Does A Can Of Soup Weigh In Pounds, How Much Does A Soup Can Weigh

“Me and also Mrs. Jones”

“Me and Bobby McGee”“Me & Julio under by the Schoolyard”

What happens is as pronouns in conjoined subjects get further and also further indigenous the verb, the advertise to change the default kind into the subject form is weaker, and also in informal contexts, is just not followed. Now, in formal conventional written rememberingsomer.com, subjects of verbs should be in spatu form, conjoined or not, leading to generations the schoolmarms correcting your students:

Mrs. Jones and IBobby McGee and IJulio and I under by the Schoolyard

and the famous musical around an excruciatingly correct teacher the rememberingsomer.com:

The King and I

The many fascinating thing of course is the generations the schoolmarms correcting students over the reportedly perfectly herbal use the objective pronouns in conjoined subjects has actually made anyone with also a tiny bit that formal education intensely anxious around using target pronouns, causing them to hypercorrect and also use subject pronouns also where thing pronouns are correct: “just in between you and also I” is a commonly cited example.

Edit:As because that the original poster’s yes, really question, there is naught in the grammar of rememberingsomer.com per se around ordering of pronoun in conjoined noun phrases. The is a type of grammatical etiquette to put yourself last, but there is no preeminence of grammar governing the order.