Most churches execute a passion Play this time the year, re-enacting the final moments the Jesus increase to and including the crucifixion. Many of these enthusiasm Plays often tend to include Jesus’ last words as tape-recorded in Matthew and Luke which appear in many Bibles transliterated as:

“Eloi! Eloi! Lama sabachthani?”

“How the heck carry out you express *that*?” ns am asked often enough. “Eh-loy eh-loy llama sab-ach!-thane-y?”

And mine answer is: You don’t.

You are watching: How do you say eloi eloi lama sabachthani

In truth, this phrase has been topic to a video game of telephone, which started in Aramaic and twisted its means through Greek, and some German order conventions, prior to landing in English.

This expression is one Aramaic translate into of the start of Psalm 22, “My God, my God, why hast she forsaken me? Why art thou so much from helping me, native the native of my groaning?”

As we deserve to see from extant translations in various other Aramaic dialects, in Jesus’ indigenous Galilean Aramaic, it was most likelyrendered:

אלהי אלהי למה שבקתניəlahí əlahí ləmáh šəvaqtáni

(The funny upside-down e signifies a shewa, a vowel type of choose the a in “above.”)

When the Gospel authors were translate in their occupational in Greek, they ran into some interesting problems. Largely thatthe Greek writing device had no way to express some of these sounds. It finished up with this (or something choose it, together there is part variation native manuscript come manuscript):

ελοι ελοι λαμα σαβαχθανιelü elü lama saḇaḥṯani

e-loo e-loo lema savakhthani

In Greek, over there was not a enough 1 come 1 connection with Aramaic vowels. Galilean’s ə (shewa) and its open vowel a (patah) were under numerous circumstances distinguished solely by emphasis and also were slightly colored relying on what sounds fell nearby. In do the efforts to approximate them, the Greek scribe chose what sound the closest based top top Greek vocalization.The Greek alphabet has no way to show an “h” sound in the middle of a word, just at the beginning. For this reason the “h” sound in əlahi disappeared, and also there was an unintentional consequence: The two letters ο (omicron) and ι (iota) when inserted together created a diphthong, comparable to the nasalized eu in French. In truth, if the diphthong were broken and the two vowels talked separately with an “h” in the middle, they space very great approximations to the original.There was also no method to refer an sh sound (above š) so that was replaced with what to be closest: σ (sigma, one “s” sound).There was no “q” sound, which in Aramaic is a guttural “k” in the very back the the throat. The was replaced with χ (chi, a sound choose clearing your throat).And finally, the specific quality the the t to be closer to their θ (theta) 보다 to your τ (tau), so the was replaced with the former, softer sound.

Now when the scriptures was analyzed into English, it went through yet anothertransliteration… yet this time from the Greek. It looked (for the many part) prefer this:

Eloi, Eloi! Lama sabachthani?

How did we arrive at this native the Greek? Greek transliteration into English made use of the complying with conventions:

Again, Greek vowels aren’t at all 1:1 through English vowels — castle represented various sounds — but your cognates in transliteration were an extremely well established.ε and η → e, ο and ω→o, ι→i,α→a, υ→y or u, etc. The use of this transliterations actually damaged up the οι diphthong in reading — so the was a step earlier in the appropriate direction.The letter χ (ḥ, chi) is, prefer in German transliteration or Scottish, rendered as “ch,” as that digraph ch in provides a similar sound.The letter θ (theta) is transliterated together “th” together that’s the closestly sound in English, back the high quality of that is not virtually as breathy.

So over there you have actually it.


Jack Kilmon says:

I won’t ascendancy out the Jesus intended Elijah come ring in the unavoidable “Kingdom of God” he, as the bar nasha, preached. Perhaps, with swollen lips and tongue and with blood and fluid filling his lungs he did without doubt cry the end Eliya, eliya lama shevawktany “Elijah, Elijah why have actually you deserted me” fairly than calling to God as in Psalm 22 Elohy, elohy lama shevawktany but this is a an additional position come my id that the Aramaic cry from the cross meant exactly what the says and Jesus didn’t screw it up, Matthew did!

I think mark was exactly in his transliteration since the western Aramaic(Judean) would have actually a qamets qatan instead of qamets gadhol because that the lamed in alaha. Easterm (Syriac) would be alef (pattah)-lamed (qamets gadhol)-heh (hiriq qatan)-yod, therefore aLAhy. Western (Judean) would certainly be alef-lamed (qamets qatan)-heh (hiriq qatan)-yod, for this reason aLOhy, hence Mark’s transliteration together ELWI. Judean Aramaic aLOhy, aLOhy LAma shevawqTAny? “God the me, God the me, why have forsaken friend me?”

Is there a difficulty with the lack of a smooth breathing for the transliterated ELWI? ns don’t think so. There to be no such thing in the first century and the original Markan autograph would certainly have had actually an uncial ELWI.

Polytonic minuscule go not start to show up in the papyri until the 2nd century CE but the aspirant to be disappearing in renowned koine and in Egyptian Greek through the first century. The exact days of these phonetic changes are more than likely uncertain but the aspirant appears to have disappeared in some intake by the late Roman and Early byzantine period. It to be being kept in “learned Greek” (pre-Koine Attic) but I think we both agree that the very first Gospel is no learned Greek.


Stephen Morton

It may be interesting to think about how Dr. George Lamsa looks in ~ this passage. He would actually translate it as, “My God, mine God, for this i was kept.” He suggested that had actually the intention to be to quote the Psalm 22 i in Aramaic, Jesus would have uttered “nashatani” instead of “sabachthani” to usage his voice spelling. Point out the book: “Idioms In The holy bible Explained and A key To The original Gospels”, George M Lamsa. HarperCollins Publishers, NYC, (c) 1985, Pp. 102-104.

See more: Is Lithium Sulfide Soluble In Water ? Lithium Sulfide

Steve Caruso (MLIS) has translated Aramaic languages professionally for over 15 years v a focus upon the Galilean dialect – the language spoken by Jesus the Nazareth. That is presently the routine Coordinator because that Interface architecture & Web advance at Raritan Valley community College. Right here on "The Aramaic brand-new Testament," though, that keeps track of Aramaic in media and scholarship at huge and continues his occupational on miscellaneous Aramaic-related grants and also projects.